Player UZR Change RZR Change LgAverage DRA Change PFr Lobaton (C) n/a -- n/a --- n/a 7.0 +0.6 -1.7 Ramos (C) n/a -- n/a --- n/a 5.7 +1.3 -2.0 Span (CF) -0.4 +1.5 .934 +.016 .923 2.6 +2.9 n/a Espinosa (2B) 0.1 -1.1 .788 +.004 .788 5.7 +2.1 n/a LaRoche (1B) -1.9 +2.4 .800 +.004 .807 - 8.0 --- n/a Harper (LF) -1.3 +0.1 .872 +.023 .871 - 5.5 -2.1 n/a Desmond (SS) -2.3 +0.3 .803 +.005 .793 -10.8 -0.4 n/a Werth (RF) -4.5 -2.9 .933 +.004 .895 - 8.6 -3.5 n/a Rendon (3B) 0.4 +0.7 .699 -.006 .708 2.4 +1.4 n/a Zimmerman (LF) 0.4 --- .905 +.003 .871 0.6 -1.6 n/a Rendon (2B) 2.0 --- .857 --- .788 - 8.0 --- n/a minimum 180 innings
By UZR Denard Span continues to improve, by exactly the same amount as last time. Danny Espinosa gave back all of his UZR improvement from the last review. Span and Anthony Rendon at third are the two players seen as improving both by the traditional statistics of DRA and by the play-by-play analysis of UZR. The only player losing ground under both systems was Jayson Werth. Rendon is now in the list as a secondbaseman as well as a thirdbaseman. Ryan Zimmerman at third just missed the cut.
Overall, both systems see the Nationals as seemingly having to found their level for the season. UZR adds up to a 0.7 increase, which is probably indicative of random variaton. DRA, including catchers, sees an identical improvement. UZR adds up the Nationals' regular fielders to -7.8, or costing the team about three-quarters of a win. DRA sees matters almost twice as bad, with -16.9 runs, or almost two wins. However, one probably ought to double the UZR total to get a better idea of the team's fielding over an entire season.
Wilson Ramos' pitch framing went down las time by 2.5 runs and this time by 1.4 runs. Jose Lobaton also slipped a bit, losing 0.4 runs, giving back some of his improvement last time. So, overall, the Nationals' catchers haven't been able to get the calls during this past two weeks or so.
____
* These are available at the Baseball Gauge of Seamheads.com. Humphreys wrote the excellent Wizardry, which is a way of looking at fielding using only the traditional statistics, and not the newfangled play-by-play metrics.
No comments:
Post a Comment